An argument against banning smoking in public places

The places they do allow smoking might lose a bit of money, but it will also help with the health problems that occur. Most people beleive that someone who is not in the smoking area of the public place will not be affected by the smoke, but smoke is able to spread in a room and affect the people around.

An argument against banning smoking in public places

It is an example of an essay where you have to give your opinion as to whether you agree or disagree. It is always a good idea to present a balanced essay which presents both sides of the argument, but you must always make it very clear what your opinion is and which side of the argument you support.

Write about the following topic: Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

An argument against banning smoking in public places

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least words. Model Answer Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places.

Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action. Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted.

In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.

An argument against banning smoking in public places

However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person.

In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas. In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places.

This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development.Nov 27,  · Best Answer: There's lots of reasons not to implement smoking bans.

Is It Really Too Late For You?

1) It's legislating prejudices - people hate smokers is the only reason it's popular 2) It's funny how millions died in war fighting for individual freedom, but it's ironic how quickly most people will throw that all away because they don't like the smell of initiativeblog.com: Resolved.

The main argument then forwarded by supporters of the ban is that this evidence suggests that an outright ban on smoking in public would be a sensible counter to the problem, and could save the NHS some of the millions it spends each year on the treating of smoking/passive smoking related diseases.

Arguments For A Smoking Ban. There are four main arguments for banning smoking in public places. The first is the issue of secondhand smoke. Ban advocates argue that “sidestream” smoke from cigarettes can harm individuals standing downwind, much in the same way that it does indoors.

The second is that cigarette butts are a form of litter. I got lung cancer because of my aunt's stupid hobby! All of you smokers should get a job, get a life, or get some friends. It would be better for the rest of us that don't smoke.

Report Abuse

Smoking threatens the air that we non-smokers breathe, making us get sick. Yes, smoking should be banned in public places ASAP. Most of them just toss it on the streets.

The streets will be much cleaner if smoking is banned. However, smokers should not be treated unfairly. There should be more places where only smokers can smoke freely. Therefore smoking should be banned in public places but more smoking areas should be built as well.

Feb 14,  · For instance, in the argumentative essay on smoking in public places, the writer should explain what the consequences are for not setting up smoking zones.

The reason is that some people may argue that smoking in public places has no negative effects that warrant its ban, while others may argue out that smoking in public places is so bad and dangerous that governments should ban it .

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? - DebateWise