There are many varying opinions about horse slaughter and I respect that. So what better than to choose horse slaughter as a topic! Just making that clear as this is such a touchy topic especially on a horse forum ha! Ask anyone in the equine industry today, and they would most likely all agree that there is a huge problem with horse over population in the United States.
The Protocols of Joly Anyone who starts looking into the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion will frequently encounter the old chestnut about a "hoax" or a "forgery".
When Philip Graves made Slaughtering for the humanness of horses essay allegation inlong before the days of the internet and all the pages detailing the various logical fallacies, his target audience had never heard of a circular argument or a non sequitur.
Debunking Graves is as easy as falling off a log.
Proponents of the "forgery" theory have an argument that runs like this: The forgery theorists will frequently not even bother to include part 2. By going from their premise 1 directly to their conclusion 3their argument becomes a non sequitur.
Mar 06, · Many people like to believe that the only horses used for slaughter are the old, crippled, sick, dangerous, or miserable horses. While some are old, lame or sick, hundreds of horses killed are young, healthy, ride able and fit. USDA/APHIS studied and recorded 92% of American horses killed in American Slaughter Plants were in good . Oct 27, · Argumentative Essay: Horse Slaughter Save the Horses: The Lesser of Two Evils For the past nine years, I have been enlightening myself and others of the facts about horse racing, horse slaughter, and the gamble behind all of it. Horse slaughter affects the economy, the mortality and standard of living of horses, and the availability of needed horse byproducts on an international level, no matter a person’s thoughts on the subject.
The conclusion does not follow from the premise. In order to get from 1 to 3they must include other postulates such as 2. Although premise 1 is truepremise 2 and conclusion 3 are both false. Clearly, the hypothetical "anti-Semites", alleged by Jews to have authored the Protocols with the help of a bit of plagiarism, do not have a monopoly on copying other people's work.
Jewish supremacists who were plotting world conquest had more motives for plagiarism than the alleged "anti-Semites". Both would have saved time and effort.
Jewish supremacists also had a powerful motive in that if the Protocols was discovered, they would be able to blame "anti-Semites", citing the "forgery" charge as their 'proof'.
Ultimately, as we shall see, the decision to have the Protocols writers deliberately copy previous works in such a way that a number of parallel passages were strikingly obvious was taken by Alphonse de Rothschild.
His inspiration for this contingency plan, of crying "forgery" in the event of discovery, can be traced to the fact that aroundat the time of his Protocols project, he discovered that merchants from countries such as Russia were bottling cheap wine and selling it with "Lafite Rothschild" labels on the bottles.
Thus, with the pirates forging Rothschild's labels, the concept of forgery would have been playing on his mind. And whatever his views were on Russians, the experience would hardly have changed them for the better!
When the Protocols Deniers put up their non sequitur argument and don't explicitly state 2they are aware that many of their dupes will implicitly assume 2given how the mainstream media has conditioned many people to perceive Jews - and "anti-Semites". Alternatively, if they do include 2they have inserted a false postulate, and thus their argument is circular.
They have started out with their desired conclusion, and have set up a false proposition in order to obtain their conclusion. Philip Graves states four "conclusions" as his 'evidence' of "forgery": As shown above, that is not evidence of forgery.
Moreover, Graves is forced to concede that "there is no evidence as to how the Geneva Dialogues reached Russia", which is consistent with the Protocols originating somewhere other than Russia. How odd that when the Russians are supposed to be "forging" a document, instead of Russians in Russia writing it in Russian, it is supposed to be Russians in Paris writing it in French, according to the "forgery" proponents' own conspiracy theory!
The Protocols "served as a weapon against the Russian Liberals". Again, this is not evidence of forgery, since the Protocols would have served as a political "weapon" irrespective of who authored them. In order for "forged" Protocols to be as useful to the Russian conservatives as the genuine article, the forger would need to do an excellent job - and forgery proponents contend that the easily spotted parallel passages occurred as a result of a "rush job", as opposed to a deliberate planting of 'evidence' that was intended to be so obvious that it could hardly be missed in the event of the Protocols' discovery.
However, Jewish supremacists would be aware that the work might be discovered, and would plan accordingly. They would have a powerful motive to do a hasty job of paraphrasing, so that the plagiarism would detected within two or three decades, would be more evident upon discovery, and "anti-Semites" could be blamed for the "forgery".
Any hypothetical "anti-Semites" would have more motive to do a good job, so that their "fraud" might remain undetected and the Protocols would continue to serve a political purpose.
Where the Protocols are not derived from the Geneva Dialogues, they "were probably supplied by the Okhrana" the Russian secret police. This is simply wishful thinking and baseless speculation on the part of Graves.
As we shall see, the Okhrana's archives were saved, shipped to the US, and opened inand there was zero evidence of a plot to forge the Protocols.However, horse slaughter in America is not completely a negative change; it has many extremely beneficial changes on the economy and even the welfare of horses.
In , close to one-hundred five horses were slaughtered in three slaughter plants, two of them in Texas and one in Illinois (Cowan 1). Horse Slaughter Essay.
written by the horse. Wherever a settler left his footprint there was a hoof print beside it. As the men came further and further west to stake their claims the domesticated horses came with them. Horse Slaughter: The Truth Unveiled Amanda Martin English November 28, The Causes of horse slaughter have many surprising effects people wouldn’t think of.
The drastic nature of these events changes the economy, as well as the lives of those who need products that come from horses.
Essay about Slaughtering for the Humanness of Horses Words | 5 Pages Slaughtering for the Humanness of Horses The closing of slaughterhouses in the United States for horses has resulted in inhumane treatment and gross neglect for thousands of horses. While slaughtering is an option for putting injured or malnourished horses out of their misery, it is an inhumane practice for both the horses and human beings and there are more appealing options to take into consideration that would help us .
Oct 27, · Argumentative Essay: Horse Slaughter Save the Horses: The Lesser of Two Evils For the past nine years, I have been enlightening myself and others of the facts about horse racing, horse slaughter, and the gamble behind all of it.